5 Reasons to Go for Manual Testing

Manual testing is still important in software testing no matter how much the world is advancing through automation. Though there are so many benefits of automated testing, and the testing tools help in increasing efficiency and speed, there are several reasons why manual testing cannot be completely shunned from the software development life cycle. So, understanding these reasons can assist the teams in making correct decisions about when and why to use the manual testing approach. 

1. Human judgment and creativity

The first benefit of manual testing is that it brings a human factor into the testing process. One more advantage of manual testing over automated testing tools is the ability to think from a fresh angle and come up with new test scenarios and edge cases different from the scripts used by the tool. It helps the testers to some extent to find complex bugs and usability issues that an automated tool cannot detect thereby making the software better.

2. Adapting to dynamic requirements

In today’s rapid development environment, requirements and specifications are always changing at a very high rate. Manual testing can handle these changes easily because of the flexibility it provides. It also allows testers to adapt the test cases during the testing phase, experiment with new features or perform exploratory testing. This agility is particularly useful when working in agile or iterative process frameworks where change is the order of the day.

3. Cost-effectiveness for small projects

Although there are numerous benefits associated with automated testing tools, their implementation can be a lengthy and costly process. Manual testing therefore comes in handy for small-scale projects or when the budget of the project is limited. A manual testing tool is usually a less complex application, which does not need any installation and configuration. This accessibility makes manual testing a viable option for early-stage startups, individual coders, and small teams with limited funds.

4. User experience evaluation

Manual testing is a useful method in case of assessing the usability of a particular software product. Users or testers can use the product like how various consumers of the product will and can give personal impressions of the product’s ease of use and satisfaction. This type of analysis supports the objective results yielded from the automated testing by offering an overall evaluation of the software from the end user perspective.

5. Identifying problems with display and interface early

Automated tests are well suited to the identification of functional bugs and glitches, but they may not be as efficient at finding visual and UI blemishes. Manual testing tools also perform exceptionally in identifying such deficiencies as layout problems, contrast issues and alignment difficulties. Developers can statically analyse the code to verify each line, function, or component for accuracy and compliance with intended guidelines. Problems involving both the vision and the User Interface should be detected as soon as possible and solved to ensure a professional look.

Conclusion

Manual testing is still considered one of the essential parts of the software testing set of solutions, as it has certain benefits that automated testing cannot provide. In speaking of the importance of manual testing, one should mention the ability to utilize human judgment and creativity. The rescuing of projects when requirements emerge that automated flow cannot handle and the provision of insights into the usability of the created software. This means that while automation has its use, knowing when to employ manual testing can go a long way in turning out high-quality software that fulfills the requirements of the customers.